Questions about self-organisation: Dorkbot |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Dorkbot Answers by Douglas Repetto
> What are the aims of the project you are involved in?
It is mostly dis-organized. We have a server at the Computer Music Center at
Columbia University (where I work). That hosts many of the dorkbot websites
(but not all). We also run many (but not all) of the mailing lists from the
server. Other than that shared web-resource, each dorkbot is more or less
completely autonomous. Very early on when there were just three or four
dorkbots I decided that the best thing to do would be to give up any control
I might have over the other organizations. At first I was worried about
other people using the name in ways I didn't like, or organizing meetings in
ways I didn't agree with, but I quickly realized that if I really wanted to
be inclusive I would have to let go and let other people find their own way.
We have a dorkbot-overlords mailing list, and we exchange occasional
messages between the various people who run all the different dorkbots
around the world. But even that is very low volume.
There is no financial support at all for the global dorkbot organization.
The use of the dorkbot.org server is free to everyone. Otherwise there are
no real resources. There are many artist groups, collectives, etc. that I'm inspired by. Some have been wonderful, others have failed miserably. I think that a lot of it comes down to luck, particular combinations of personalities, rather than the specifics of how they were organized. I doubt that there are really optimal organizational strategies that will work everywhere. One example that I find particularly inspiring: frog peak music: this is a composers collective and independent publisher of experimental musical scores, recordings, and writing. They are committed to the idea of "availability over promotion", meaning their main concern is to help things exist, rather than making hits or selling lots of copies. Another idea of theirs is that the artists they work with decide what gets published and how. They accept artists, rather than particular works by artists. http://www.frogpeak.org
> What are your hopes for the future? I try to stay kind of neutral about the future of dorkbot. As organizations grow they often develop self-protection mechanisms, and sometimes maintaining the organization becomes more important than the actual activities of the organization. If dorkbot is no longer useful or interesting in a particular city, then we just let it die. Sometimes it comes back in another form, sometimes it doesn't. I don't try to revive meetings or put any pressure on people to continue meeting. I will keep doing dorkbot in New York as long as it's interesting and people keep volunteering to give presentations. But there are lots of other organizations doing similar things to dorkbot, so I'm sure that if we go away other things that are just as useful/interesting will take its place. I'm constantly working to understand how something can seem to be both the most important thing in the world and also completely inconsequential. That's my primary organizational strategy!
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 03 June 2008 ) |