Dorkbot
Answers by Douglas Repetto
> What are the aims of the project you are involved in?
dorkbot has only a motto: "people doing strange things with electricity".
Different groups have interpreted the motto in different ways. When I
thought of the motto I purposely made it broad and inclusive so that it
would interest many different kinds of people doing different kinds of
things. Artists, inventors, scientists, engineers. The exciting thing to me
is to learn about strange things that creative people are doing around the
world, with no regard for genre, style, school of thought, area of
expertise, etc.
> How is the project organised?
It is mostly dis-organized. We have a server at the Computer Music Center at
Columbia University (where I work). That hosts many of the dorkbot websites
(but not all). We also run many (but not all) of the mailing lists from the
server. Other than that shared web-resource, each dorkbot is more or less
completely autonomous. Very early on when there were just three or four
dorkbots I decided that the best thing to do would be to give up any control
I might have over the other organizations. At first I was worried about
other people using the name in ways I didn't like, or organizing meetings in
ways I didn't agree with, but I quickly realized that if I really wanted to
be inclusive I would have to let go and let other people find their own way.
We have a dorkbot-overlords mailing list, and we exchange occasional
messages between the various people who run all the different dorkbots
around the world. But even that is very low volume.
I think that the
main thing that has given dorkbot an identity of sorts is the website and
the motto. People see that it is not super self-serious, that it is informal
and friendly. That it is about creativity. I think that is enough.
> How do you support the work financially and what impact does this have on your project?
There is no financial support at all for the global dorkbot organization.
The use of the dorkbot.org server is free to everyone. Otherwise there are
no real resources.
Each local dorkbot has to find its own way. In New
York we run dorkbot on zero dollars. For several years I held the meetings
in a space in the building where I work, and now we have them at a gallery
called Location One. Everyone involved donates their time.
Other
dorkbots have raised money in different ways, some have received government
grants, some have sponsors, some take donations at the door. One thing I've
learned is that the financial relationship between organizers, participants,
and audience can be very different in different places, particularly in
different countries. So I have not tried to impose my own ideas about how
things should be arranged financially on the other dorkbots.
> What do you feel you have achieved, and what are the problems you face?
We have had thousands of people give informal presentations of their work. I
think that dorkbot has played some part in encouraging people to get
creative with technology, to experiment, to embrace a DIY mode. Of course
the main idea behind dorkbot -- sharing your work with your neighbors -- is
not new at all. But contemporary culture can often put a lot of pressure on
people to "succeed", to "be the best", and that often makes people _not_
want to share what they're doing, puts tremendous pressure on them, makes
them think that the only reason to do something is to be a star. I'm very
happy when someone presents something unfinished, something a little bit
crazy, a little bit not-so-good. The most important thing is that people
feel like they can participate in our material culture, that they are not
simply consumers. So dorkbot has been a nice way to encourage people to
participate, while removing some of the pressure to be a
star.
Problems -- each dorkbot has its own difficulties, sometimes it's
space, sometimes its money, sometimes it's finding presenters. I've been
very lucky in New York, we have a nice space that is donated to us, there
are always many people who want to show their work. In some other towns it's
more difficult. There have been occasional problems with power-struggles
between the people running a dorkbot, and sometimes they come to me to
help solve the problem. That is very unpleasant, but I try to be an
objective resource. In general, for an unstructured international
organization with many people involved, we have had surprisingly few big
problems. That is partly because we have been un-ambitious, which I
think is often a good thing.
> Are there any past projects/models which have inspired you?
There are many artist groups, collectives, etc. that I'm inspired by. Some
have been wonderful, others have failed miserably. I think that a lot of it
comes down to luck, particular combinations of personalities, rather than
the specifics of how they were organized. I doubt that there are really
optimal organizational strategies that will work everywhere.
One example
that I find particularly inspiring:
frog peak music: this is a composers
collective and independent publisher of experimental musical scores,
recordings, and writing. They are committed to the idea of "availability
over promotion", meaning their main concern is to help things exist, rather
than making hits or selling lots of copies. Another idea of theirs is that
the artists they work with decide what gets published and how. They accept
artists, rather than particular works by artists. http://www.frogpeak.org
> What are your hopes for the future?
I try to stay kind of neutral about the future of dorkbot. As organizations
grow they often develop self-protection mechanisms, and sometimes
maintaining the organization becomes more important than the actual
activities of the organization. If dorkbot is no longer useful or
interesting in a particular city, then we just let it die. Sometimes it
comes back in another form, sometimes it doesn't. I don't try to revive
meetings or put any pressure on people to continue meeting. I will keep
doing dorkbot in New York as long as it's interesting and people keep
volunteering to give presentations. But there are lots of other
organizations doing similar things to dorkbot, so I'm sure that if we go
away other things that are just as useful/interesting will take its
place.
I'm constantly working to understand how something can seem to be
both the most important thing in the world and also completely
inconsequential. That's my primary organizational strategy!
www.dorkbot.org
|